« June 1, 2008 - June 7, 2008 | Main

July 6, 2008 - July 12, 2008

July 10, 2008

Hanna Montana on Vanity Fair & Watching SATC

Between the disdainful finger wagging and the vacuous uproar about sexual exploitation of the female tween-star is the ironic glimpse into American pop culture where a 15-year-old with a hit television show on the Disney channel claims her favorite show is ‘Sex in the City.” 

I am certainly not a fan of Miley Cyrus’s photo on the June issue of Vanity Fair (I find the photograph composition overused and stereotypical blah capturing a cosmetically unflattering side to the Hanna Montana star.  On first impression I did not see sexual overtones in the photograph, but I guess any teenager in the Lolita-ish age might be perceived as sexual if she is photographed in a bed sheet).  Disney obviously got into a huffy-tuffy fit about it and everyone blamed the magazine and its crew (ignoring the fact that her famous daddy on and off screen, Billy Ray Cyrus was at the photo shoot).  i am not going to add that photo to the post because the photo is nothing, it is just Cyrus wrapped in a bed sheet in black and white.  She really doesn't look nice in the photograph, she looks like a tired, sick kid. 

Her interview was more disturbing that the photograph. 

The Miley Cyrus of the Disney show Hanna Montana would certainly not be allowed to watch ‘Sex in the City’, At 34, I can barely process the casual sexual liberation of the ‘Sex in the City’ characters and in certain scenarios and storylines, apparently neither can the characters. 

I am not exactly sure whom Vanity Fair is trying to sell to anymore.  I can’t expect anyone legal to vote is even curiously interested in Miley Cyrus.  And there is no way my 7 year is reading Vanity Fair and you can be certain at 14 she won’t be watching reruns of Sex in the City.

July 07, 2008

Diss the future of Hindi-movie romance and skip Love Story 2008.

Rich, bored, unloved, motherless son, Karan (Harman Baweja) falls in love with butterfly chasing, dear-dairy-journaling sweetax Sana (Priyanka Chopra).  After some customary na-na-karte-pyar-tumhi-sai-kar-betha romance, and engagement is to follow.  Karan introduces Sana to eccentric uncle Dr. Ya an ex-NASA scientist who is inventing a time machine.  Sana expresses an interest in Mumbai in 2050 and sets the time-pod to 2050.  Cutback to the puppy love and suddenly Sana dies in a freak accident.

Forlorn Karan and Sana’s little brother and sister with Dr. Ya travel to 2050 to bring the future, re-born Sana to 2008 and she will remember jaanam jaanam ka pyar with Karan. 

The Karan-led gang travel to 2050 post-interval and enter the “special effects”.  Papa Baweja’s vision of the future is a cut-paste collage from Hollywood blockbusters: I, Robot, Minority Report, Star Wars, Back to the Future, and the Fifth Element but the effects just plain fail to impress most viewers who have seen the above and the more recent fare of digital effects in Hollywood creations.  The effects exist only to awe and tantalize gen-Xers who don’t watch Hollywood movies (if such a niche group exists).

Sana is now famous pop-star red-haired Zeisha and Mumbai seems to how become Hong Kong run by the Japanese.  A silly, microchip villain wanting Dr. Ya’s time machine provides for some galactic flying car chases and much to an exhausted audience’s dismay Karan has to re-coo and re-woo Zeisha so she will remember their love from her last life and return to 2008.  There is a talking teddy bear and feeling Robot , boobs sari-clad in Zeisha’s people-free life. 

The movie is exhaustingly aggravating because Baweja khandan really believes this is A-class commercial cinema, you can see the belief permeate in the movie’s production-attitude and you want to sit-down and counsel them extensively, expensively.

Dr. Ya played by Boman Irani and Sana’s loud-loving Punju mother played by Archana Puran-Singh is ho-hum-hamy and I hope they got paid handsomely for their roles, I can’t expect them getting anything else from boy-Baweja’s debut debacle.

Priyanka Chopra has screen presence that out-rivals any of her rivals.  The camera stupendously loves her in every shot.  She makes bad acting look good, her motion-picture mojo intoxicates the screen but unfortunately bad writing will make its nasty self evident and eventually even Piggy Chops can’t mesmerize with her magic.

The story is so weak and contrived and the even worse writing can't force a connection to characters with an audience who wasn't looking for high-brow cinema but simply an evening of entertainment but wishing intubation once the shoddy story continues ad-nauseum.

But Love Story 2050 was Harman’s launch pad towards Bollywood stardom.  This was an expensive screen test and I don’t think he completely failed it.  There are plenty of stars in the Hindi film industry who don’t perform to par with the greats and then again it was also his first movie so maybe can learn the trade.  Baweja is certainly not going away after his debut but he will have to overcome his identity crisis.

Boy-Baweja with his eerie resemblance to Hrithik, another cut and paste job, one can’t help wonder and then he speaks and all the similarities end.  His dialogue delivery is high-school-girl-squeaky and oh his limp, expressionless eyes emote nothing except dumbfound-ness in every frame, shot, and scene.

Hrithik Roshan and an other authentic actors and actresses of the same category emote with their eye expressions; it is the difference between playing an imaginary, crazy character believably or a real-life type character without credibility.

Unfortunately Boy-Baweja in Love Story 2050 is just not a natural and he will have to work less on the deltoids and more on the dialogue delivery.  Sure he can dance, fight, look-decently attractive to some I suppose, but Pappu can’t act, saala.

Not in 2008 and not in Love Story 2050.